Vibe Compliance

Compliance platform comparison

Hyperproof vs Secureframe

Secureframe's typical price is lower ($20,000 median against $41,400 median). Secureframe publishes 300+ integrations; Hyperproof doesn't publish a count. Secureframe is listed by 13 directory audit firms; Hyperproof isn't counted. On G2, Hyperproof rates 4.5 from 223 reviews and Secureframe 4.7 from 835.

Updated How we compare8 sources

Short verdict: which one fits you

A fit guide, not a ranking. We don't pick an overall winner.

Choose Hyperproof if…

  • you need SCIM provisioning confirmed as standard [3]
  • you match its stated best fit: established GRC teams running several frameworks and audits at once [3]

Choose Secureframe if…

  • a lower typical price matters most ($20,000 median vs $41,400 median) [2]
  • you want the larger published integration catalogue (300+) [5]
  • you want more choice of audit firm (13 directory firms) [4]
  • you want a faster rollout (2 months vs 3 months on G2) [1]

Neither runs the audit itself. If you want software and audit from one provider, compare Thoropass. [3]

At a glance

Every figure is labelled:Vendor-reportedThird-partyUser reviewsNot disclosed

Hyperproof

Governance, risk and compliance platform for established teams running several frameworks and audits at once.

Typical annual price
$41,400 medianThird-party[2]
Observed contracts (Vendr)
$22,215 to $70,000Third-party[2]
G2 rating
4.5 · 223 reviewsUser reviews[1]
G2 time to implement
3 monthsUser reviews[1]
Integrations
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Frameworks
160+Vendor-reported[7]
Audit firms in the directory
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Default test cadence
You set it: daily, weekly or continuousVendor-reported[7]

Secureframe

Compliance platform sold as named packages (Fundamentals, Complete, Defense) with expert guidance.

Typical annual price
$20,000 medianThird-party[2]
Observed contracts (Vendr)
$7,733 to $32,575Third-party[2]
G2 rating
4.7 · 835 reviewsUser reviews[1]
G2 time to implement
2 monthsUser reviews[1]
Integrations
300+Vendor-reported[5]
Frameworks
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Audit firms in the directory
13 directory firmsThird-party[4]
Default test cadence
Daily to monthly, by testThird-party[8]

Pricing: is Hyperproof or Secureframe cheaper?

Secureframe's typical price is lower ($20,000 median against $41,400 median).

Hyperproof
$22,215 to $70,000Third-party[2]
Median $41,400
Secureframe
$7,733 to $32,575Third-party[2]
Median $20,000

Observed annual contract values reported by Vendr, read 5 October 2026. These are different buyers and scopes, not quotes. [2]

AttributeHyperproofSecureframe
Typical annual price
$41,400 medianThird-party[2]
$20,000 medianThird-party[2]
Observed contract range (Vendr)
$22,215 to $70,000Third-party[2]
$7,733 to $32,575Third-party[2]

Before comparing totals, get both quotes on the same written scope: employees, frameworks, modules, implementation, support level, contract term, renewal cap and the auditor's fee as its own line.

Integrations and automated testing

Secureframe publishes 300+ integrations; Hyperproof doesn't publish a count.

AttributeHyperproofSecureframe
Integrations
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
300+Vendor-reported[5]
Default test cadence
You set it: daily, weekly or continuousVendor-reported[7]
Daily to monthly, by testThird-party[8]

On G2, "Integration issues" is among Secureframe's most-mentioned complaints (184 G2 mentions). [1]

Integration counts are vendor claims and are counted differently by each vendor. Test the systems you depend on during a trial.

Frameworks

Hyperproof lists 160+; Secureframe doesn't publish a count.

AttributeHyperproofSecureframe
Frameworks published
160+Vendor-reported[7]
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
ISO 27001
IncludedThird-party[3]
IncludedThird-party[3]
HIPAA
IncludedVendor-reported[7]
IncludedThird-party[3]

Capabilities compared

From SOC2Auditors.org capability profiles and vendor plan pages. "Not disclosed" means we could not confirm either way; it does not mean the feature is missing.

AttributeHyperproofSecureframe
Auditor workspace
IncludedThird-party[3]
IncludedVendor-reported[6]
Trust centre
PartialThird-party[3]
IncludedThird-party[3]
SCIM provisioning
IncludedThird-party[3]
Add-on or higher tierVendor-reported[6]
Audit from the same provider
Not offeredThird-party[3]
Not offeredThird-party[3]
Self-hosting option
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]

Working with your auditor

Secureframe is listed by 13 directory audit firms; Hyperproof isn't counted.

AttributeHyperproofSecureframe
Audit firms in the directory
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
13 directory firmsThird-party[4]
Audit from the same provider
Not offeredThird-party[3]
Not offeredThird-party[3]

Hyperproof doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Secureframe doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Directory counts are firms that list each platform, not partnerships or quality ratings. [4]

What reviewers say on G2

On G2, Hyperproof rates 4.5 from 223 reviews and Secureframe 4.7 from 835.

Hyperproof

Listing-site ratings
G2
4.5
223 reviews

Recurring praise

  • Ease of use67 G2 mentions
  • Compliance management37 G2 mentions

Recurring complaints

  • Learning curve17 G2 mentions
  • Learning difficulty13 G2 mentions

Secureframe

Listing-site ratings
G2
4.7
835 reviews

Recurring praise

  • Ease of use650 G2 mentions
  • Compliance552 G2 mentions

Recurring complaints

  • Integration issues184 G2 mentions
  • Limited customization141 G2 mentions

Source: [1]

G2 time to implement: Hyperproof 3 months, Secureframe 2 months. Mention counts scale with review volume, so compare them as proportions, not totals. [1]

What each product looks like

Screenshots published by each vendor on its website or G2 listing, credited below each image.

Hyperproof

Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages
Hyperproof: Risk register with a risk heat map
Risk register with a risk heat mapImage: Hyperproof, via G2 listing · retrieved 5 October 2026
Hyperproof: Integrations, with a Jira connection being set up
Integrations, with a Jira connection being set upImage: Hyperproof, via G2 listing · retrieved 5 October 2026
Hyperproof: SOC 2 Type 2 audit view with an audit timeline
SOC 2 Type 2 audit view with an audit timelineImage: Hyperproof, via G2 listing · retrieved 5 October 2026

Secureframe

Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages
Secureframe: Test library of automated tests by integration
Test library of automated tests by integrationImage: Secureframe, via G2 listing · retrieved 5 October 2026
Secureframe: Custom frameworks built inside the platform
Custom frameworks built inside the platformImage: Secureframe, via G2 listing · retrieved 5 October 2026
Secureframe: Controls mapped across frameworks, with a control health summary
Controls mapped across frameworks, with a control health summaryImage: Secureframe, via G2 listing · retrieved 5 October 2026

Strengths and limitations

Hyperproof

Strengths

  • Built for established GRC teams running concurrent audits. [3]
  • Claims 160+ pre-built frameworks, including an out-of-the-box HIPAA framework. [7]
  • SCIM provisioning documented through Okta or Entra. [3]

Limitations

  • Highest observed contract median of the seven platforms with Vendr data: $41,400. [2]
  • Longest G2 time to implement among the nine platforms we compare: 3 months. [1]
  • Described as too broad and costly for a small team's first SOC 2. [3]

Secureframe

Strengths

  • Fundamentals package price published on the vendor site: from $7,500 a year. [5]
  • 300+ native integrations. [5]
  • Trust centre included free on Fundamentals. [3]

Limitations

  • SSO and SCIM require the quote-based Complete package. [5][6]
  • Fewer directory auditors than Drata, Sprinto or Vanta (13). [4]

Five tests to run on both before you sign

  1. Connect your three most important systems

    Use a trial or sandbox to connect your cloud provider, identity provider and code host, and check that each produces evidence without manual uploads.

  2. Ask your auditor which one they work in

    An auditor who already works in a platform usually needs less back-and-forth on evidence.

  3. Get both quotes on the same written scope

    Employees, frameworks, modules, support level, contract term, renewal cap, and the audit as its own line.

  4. Check what is an add-on

    SSO, SCIM, extra frameworks, questionnaires and trust-centre features are often tier-gated. Ask for the full price of the scope you need.

  5. Ask how you would leave

    Confirm you can export policies, evidence with timestamps and test history, and whether read-only access continues after the contract ends.

Alternatives and related comparisons

Compare Hyperproof with

All Hyperproof alternatives →

Compare Secureframe with

All Secureframe alternatives →

Frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures on this page. Where something isn't disclosed, the answer says so.

Is Hyperproof or Secureframe cheaper?

Secureframe's typical price is lower ($20,000 median against $41,400 median). Prices depend on employees, frameworks and modules, so compare quotes for the same written scope.

Which has more integrations, Hyperproof or Secureframe?

Secureframe publishes 300+ integrations; Hyperproof doesn't publish a count. Counts are vendor claims; test the systems you depend on.

Do more auditors work with Hyperproof or Secureframe?

Secureframe is listed by 13 directory audit firms; Hyperproof isn't counted.

Which is rated higher on G2, Hyperproof or Secureframe?

On G2, Hyperproof rates 4.5 from 223 reviews and Secureframe 4.7 from 835. Ratings come from self-selected reviewers.

Which is faster to implement?

G2 reviewers report 3 months for Hyperproof and 2 months for Secureframe. Your own timeline depends on scope and how much evidence already exists.

Can Hyperproof or Secureframe include the SOC 2 audit?

Hyperproof doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Secureframe doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately.

Can I switch from Hyperproof to Secureframe mid-audit?

You can, but it is risky during a Type 2 observation period, because your auditor needs continuous evidence for the whole period. Most teams switch between observation periods.