Compliance platform comparison
Secureframe's typical price is lower ($20,000 median against $26,927 median). Secureframe publishes the larger integration catalogue (300+ vs 200+). Thoropass runs the audit through its related CPA firm. 13 firms in SOC2Auditors.org's directory list Secureframe. On G2, Secureframe rates 4.7 from 835 reviews and Thoropass 4.7 from 586.
Short verdict: which one fits you
A fit guide, not a ranking. We don't pick an overall winner.
Choose Secureframe if…
Neither can be self-hosted. If you need that, compare Comp AI. [6]
Compliance platform sold as named packages (Fundamentals, Complete, Defense) with expert guidance.
Compliance platform paired with its related CPA firm, Thoropass Assurance, so software and audit come from one provider.
Secureframe's typical price is lower ($20,000 median against $26,927 median).
Observed annual contract values reported by Vendr, read 5 October 2026. These are different buyers and scopes, not quotes. [2]
| Attribute | Secureframe | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Typical annual price | $20,000 medianThird-party[2] | $26,927 medianThird-party[2] |
| Observed contract range (Vendr) | $7,733 to $32,575Third-party[2] | $1,145 to $52,209Third-party[2] |
Before comparing totals, get both quotes on the same written scope: employees, frameworks, modules, implementation, support level, contract term, renewal cap and the auditor's fee as its own line.
Secureframe publishes the larger integration catalogue (300+ vs 200+).
| Attribute | Secureframe | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | ||
| Default test cadence | Daily to monthly, by testThird-party[11] | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] |
On G2, "Integration issues" is among Secureframe's most-mentioned complaints (184 G2 mentions). [1]
On G2, "Integration issues" is among Thoropass's most-mentioned complaints (34 G2 mentions). [1]
Integration counts are vendor claims and are counted differently by each vendor. Test the systems you depend on during a trial.
Secureframe doesn't publish a count; Thoropass lists 18 named.
| Attribute | Secureframe | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks published | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | 18 namedVendor-reported[9] |
| ISO 27001 | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| HIPAA | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
From SOC2Auditors.org capability profiles and vendor plan pages. "Not disclosed" means we could not confirm either way; it does not mean the feature is missing.
| Attribute | Secureframe | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Auditor workspace | IncludedVendor-reported[7] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| Trust centre | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| SCIM provisioning | Add-on or higher tierVendor-reported[7] | IncludedVendor-reported[8] |
| Audit from the same provider | Not offeredThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| Self-hosting option | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] |
Thoropass runs the audit through its related CPA firm. 13 firms in SOC2Auditors.org's directory list Secureframe.
| Attribute | Secureframe | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Audit firms in the directory | 13 directory firmsThird-party[4] | Own CPA firmThird-party[3] |
| Audit from the same provider | Not offeredThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
Secureframe doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Thoropass runs it through its related CPA firm, Thoropass Assurance, priced separately. Directory counts are firms that list each platform, not partnerships or quality ratings. [4]
On G2, Secureframe rates 4.7 from 835 reviews and Thoropass 4.7 from 586.
| G2 | 835 reviews |
|---|
| G2 | 586 reviews |
|---|
Source: [1]
G2 time to implement: Secureframe 2 months, Thoropass not reported. Mention counts scale with review volume, so compare them as proportions, not totals. [1]
Screenshots published by each vendor on its website or G2 listing, credited below each image.
Use a trial or sandbox to connect your cloud provider, identity provider and code host, and check that each produces evidence without manual uploads.
An auditor who already works in a platform usually needs less back-and-forth on evidence.
Employees, frameworks, modules, support level, contract term, renewal cap, and the audit as its own line.
SSO, SCIM, extra frameworks, questionnaires and trust-centre features are often tier-gated. Ask for the full price of the scope you need.
Confirm you can export policies, evidence with timestamps and test history, and whether read-only access continues after the contract ends.
Answers use the figures on this page. Where something isn't disclosed, the answer says so.
Secureframe's typical price is lower ($20,000 median against $26,927 median). Prices depend on employees, frameworks and modules, so compare quotes for the same written scope.
Secureframe publishes the larger integration catalogue (300+ vs 200+). Counts are vendor claims; test the systems you depend on.
Thoropass runs the audit through its related CPA firm. 13 firms in SOC2Auditors.org's directory list Secureframe.
On G2, Secureframe rates 4.7 from 835 reviews and Thoropass 4.7 from 586. Ratings come from self-selected reviewers.
G2 reviewers report 2 months for Secureframe and no figure for Thoropass. Your own timeline depends on scope and how much evidence already exists.
Secureframe doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Thoropass runs it through its related CPA firm, Thoropass Assurance, priced separately.
You can, but it is risky during a Type 2 observation period, because your auditor needs continuous evidence for the whole period. Most teams switch between observation periods.
