Compliance platform comparison
Scrut Automation's typical price is lower ($7,250 median against $26,927 median). Thoropass publishes 200+ integrations; Scrut Automation doesn't publish a count. Thoropass runs the audit through its related CPA firm. 1 firm in SOC2Auditors.org's directory lists Scrut Automation. On G2, Scrut Automation rates 4.9 from 1,338 reviews and Thoropass 4.7 from 586.
Short verdict: which one fits you
A fit guide, not a ranking. We don't pick an overall winner.
Choose Scrut Automation if…
Neither can be self-hosted. If you need that, compare Comp AI. [6]
Compliance and risk platform for growth-stage tech teams running SOC 2 alongside other frameworks.
Compliance platform paired with its related CPA firm, Thoropass Assurance, so software and audit come from one provider.
Scrut Automation's typical price is lower ($7,250 median against $26,927 median).
Observed annual contract values reported by Vendr, read 5 October 2026. These are different buyers and scopes, not quotes. [2]
| Attribute | Scrut Automation | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Typical annual price | $7,250 medianThird-party[2] | $26,927 medianThird-party[2] |
| Observed contract range (Vendr) | $5,160 to $27,050Third-party[2] | $1,145 to $52,209Third-party[2] |
Before comparing totals, get both quotes on the same written scope: employees, frameworks, modules, implementation, support level, contract term, renewal cap and the auditor's fee as its own line.
Thoropass publishes 200+ integrations; Scrut Automation doesn't publish a count.
| Attribute | Scrut Automation | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | |
| Default test cadence | DailyThird-party[11] | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] |
On G2, "Integration issues" is among Thoropass's most-mentioned complaints (34 G2 mentions). [1]
Integration counts are vendor claims and are counted differently by each vendor. Test the systems you depend on during a trial.
Scrut Automation lists 60 listed; Thoropass lists 18 named.
| Attribute | Scrut Automation | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks published | 60 listedVendor-reported[8] | 18 namedVendor-reported[10] |
| ISO 27001 | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| HIPAA | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
From SOC2Auditors.org capability profiles and vendor plan pages. "Not disclosed" means we could not confirm either way; it does not mean the feature is missing.
| Attribute | Scrut Automation | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Auditor workspace | IncludedVendor-reported[7] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| Trust centre | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| SCIM provisioning | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedVendor-reported[9] |
| Audit from the same provider | Not offeredThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| Self-hosting option | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] |
Thoropass runs the audit through its related CPA firm. 1 firm in SOC2Auditors.org's directory lists Scrut Automation.
| Attribute | Scrut Automation | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Audit firms in the directory | 1 directory firmThird-party[13] | Own CPA firmThird-party[3] |
| Audit from the same provider | Not offeredThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
Scrut Automation doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Thoropass runs it through its related CPA firm, Thoropass Assurance, priced separately. Directory counts are firms that list each platform, not partnerships or quality ratings. [4]
On G2, Scrut Automation rates 4.9 from 1,338 reviews and Thoropass 4.7 from 586.
| G2 | 1,338 reviews |
|---|
| G2 | 586 reviews |
|---|
Source: [1]
G2 time to implement: Scrut Automation 1 month, Thoropass not reported. Mention counts scale with review volume, so compare them as proportions, not totals. [1]
Screenshots published by each vendor on its website or G2 listing, credited below each image.
Use a trial or sandbox to connect your cloud provider, identity provider and code host, and check that each produces evidence without manual uploads.
An auditor who already works in a platform usually needs less back-and-forth on evidence.
Employees, frameworks, modules, support level, contract term, renewal cap, and the audit as its own line.
SSO, SCIM, extra frameworks, questionnaires and trust-centre features are often tier-gated. Ask for the full price of the scope you need.
Confirm you can export policies, evidence with timestamps and test history, and whether read-only access continues after the contract ends.
Answers use the figures on this page. Where something isn't disclosed, the answer says so.
Scrut Automation's typical price is lower ($7,250 median against $26,927 median). Prices depend on employees, frameworks and modules, so compare quotes for the same written scope.
Thoropass publishes 200+ integrations; Scrut Automation doesn't publish a count. Counts are vendor claims; test the systems you depend on.
Thoropass runs the audit through its related CPA firm. 1 firm in SOC2Auditors.org's directory lists Scrut Automation.
On G2, Scrut Automation rates 4.9 from 1,338 reviews and Thoropass 4.7 from 586. Ratings come from self-selected reviewers.
G2 reviewers report 1 month for Scrut Automation and no figure for Thoropass. Your own timeline depends on scope and how much evidence already exists.
Scrut Automation doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Thoropass runs it through its related CPA firm, Thoropass Assurance, priced separately.
You can, but it is risky during a Type 2 observation period, because your auditor needs continuous evidence for the whole period. Most teams switch between observation periods.
