Compliance platform comparison
Scrut Automation has a published or observed price ($7,250 median); Comp AI quotes on a sales call. Comp AI publishes 580+ integrations; Scrut Automation doesn't publish a count. Scrut Automation is listed by 1 directory audit firm; Comp AI isn't counted. On G2, Comp AI rates 4.7 from 74 reviews and Scrut Automation 4.9 from 1,338.
Short verdict: which one fits you
A fit guide, not a ranking. We don't pick an overall winner.
Choose Comp AI if…
Neither runs the audit itself. If you want software and audit from one provider, compare Thoropass. [3]
Open-core compliance platform whose evidence-collection code can be inspected or self-hosted, with a managed cloud option.
Compliance and risk platform for growth-stage tech teams running SOC 2 alongside other frameworks.
Scrut Automation has a published or observed price ($7,250 median); Comp AI quotes on a sales call.
| Attribute | Comp AI | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Typical annual price | Not publishedNot disclosed[6] | $7,250 medianThird-party[2] |
| Observed contract range (Vendr) | Not reportedNot disclosed[2] | $5,160 to $27,050Third-party[2] |
Before comparing totals, get both quotes on the same written scope: employees, frameworks, modules, implementation, support level, contract term, renewal cap and the auditor's fee as its own line.
Comp AI publishes 580+ integrations; Scrut Automation doesn't publish a count.
| Attribute | Comp AI | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | |
| Default test cadence | DailyVendor-reported[6] | DailyThird-party[9] |
Integration counts are vendor claims and are counted differently by each vendor. Test the systems you depend on during a trial.
Comp AI doesn't publish a count; Scrut Automation lists 60 listed.
| Attribute | Comp AI | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks published | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | 60 listedVendor-reported[8] |
| ISO 27001 | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| HIPAA | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
From SOC2Auditors.org capability profiles and vendor plan pages. "Not disclosed" means we could not confirm either way; it does not mean the feature is missing.
| Attribute | Comp AI | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Auditor workspace | PartialThird-party[3] | IncludedVendor-reported[7] |
| Trust centre | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| SCIM provisioning | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| Audit from the same provider | Add-on or higher tierThird-party[3] | Not offeredThird-party[3] |
| Self-hosting option | IncludedThird-party[3] | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] |
Scrut Automation is listed by 1 directory audit firm; Comp AI isn't counted.
| Attribute | Comp AI | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Audit firms in the directory | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | 1 directory firmThird-party[10] |
| Audit from the same provider | Add-on or higher tierThird-party[3] | Not offeredThird-party[3] |
Comp AI says audits can be included in its quote. Scrut Automation doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Directory counts are firms that list each platform, not partnerships or quality ratings. [4]
On G2, Comp AI rates 4.7 from 74 reviews and Scrut Automation 4.9 from 1,338.
| G2 | 74 reviews |
|---|
| G2 | 1,338 reviews |
|---|
Source: [1]
G2 time to implement: Comp AI 1 month, Scrut Automation 1 month. Mention counts scale with review volume, so compare them as proportions, not totals. [1]
Screenshots published by each vendor on its website or G2 listing, credited below each image.
Use a trial or sandbox to connect your cloud provider, identity provider and code host, and check that each produces evidence without manual uploads.
An auditor who already works in a platform usually needs less back-and-forth on evidence.
Employees, frameworks, modules, support level, contract term, renewal cap, and the audit as its own line.
SSO, SCIM, extra frameworks, questionnaires and trust-centre features are often tier-gated. Ask for the full price of the scope you need.
Confirm you can export policies, evidence with timestamps and test history, and whether read-only access continues after the contract ends.
Answers use the figures on this page. Where something isn't disclosed, the answer says so.
Scrut Automation has a published or observed price ($7,250 median); Comp AI quotes on a sales call. Prices depend on employees, frameworks and modules, so compare quotes for the same written scope.
Comp AI publishes 580+ integrations; Scrut Automation doesn't publish a count. Counts are vendor claims; test the systems you depend on.
Scrut Automation is listed by 1 directory audit firm; Comp AI isn't counted.
On G2, Comp AI rates 4.7 from 74 reviews and Scrut Automation 4.9 from 1,338. Ratings come from self-selected reviewers.
G2 reviewers report 1 month for Comp AI and 1 month for Scrut Automation. Your own timeline depends on scope and how much evidence already exists.
Comp AI says audits can be included in its quote. Scrut Automation doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately.
You can, but it is risky during a Type 2 observation period, because your auditor needs continuous evidence for the whole period. Most teams switch between observation periods.
