Vibe Compliance

Compliance platform comparison

Comp AI vs Hyperproof

Hyperproof has a published or observed price ($41,400 median); Comp AI quotes on a sales call. Comp AI publishes 580+ integrations; Hyperproof doesn't publish a count. On G2, Comp AI rates 4.7 from 74 reviews and Hyperproof 4.5 from 223.

Updated How we compare6 sources

Short verdict: which one fits you

A fit guide, not a ranking. We don't pick an overall winner.

Choose Comp AI if…

  • you want the larger published integration catalogue (580+) [5]
  • you need to inspect the code or self-host [5]
  • you want a faster rollout (1 month vs 3 months on G2) [1]
  • you need a trust centre confirmed as standard [3]

Choose Hyperproof if…

  • a lower typical price matters most ($41,400 median; Comp AI doesn't publish one) [2]
  • you need SCIM provisioning confirmed as standard [3]
  • you need an auditor workspace confirmed as standard [3]
  • you match its stated best fit: established GRC teams running several frameworks and audits at once [3]

Neither runs the audit itself. If you want software and audit from one provider, compare Thoropass. [3]

At a glance

Every figure is labelled:Vendor-reportedThird-partyUser reviewsNot disclosed

Comp AI

Open-core compliance platform whose evidence-collection code can be inspected or self-hosted, with a managed cloud option.

Typical annual price
Not publishedNot disclosed[5]
Observed contracts (Vendr)
Not reportedNot disclosed[2]
G2 rating
4.7 · 74 reviewsUser reviews[1]
G2 time to implement
1 monthUser reviews[1]
Integrations
580+Vendor-reported[5]
Frameworks
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Audit firms in the directory
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Default test cadence
DailyVendor-reported[5]

Hyperproof

Governance, risk and compliance platform for established teams running several frameworks and audits at once.

Typical annual price
$41,400 medianThird-party[2]
Observed contracts (Vendr)
$22,215 to $70,000Third-party[2]
G2 rating
4.5 · 223 reviewsUser reviews[1]
G2 time to implement
3 monthsUser reviews[1]
Integrations
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Frameworks
160+Vendor-reported[6]
Audit firms in the directory
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Default test cadence
You set it: daily, weekly or continuousVendor-reported[6]

Pricing: is Comp AI or Hyperproof cheaper?

Hyperproof has a published or observed price ($41,400 median); Comp AI quotes on a sales call.

AttributeComp AIHyperproof
Typical annual price
Not publishedNot disclosed[5]
$41,400 medianThird-party[2]
Observed contract range (Vendr)
Not reportedNot disclosed[2]
$22,215 to $70,000Third-party[2]

Before comparing totals, get both quotes on the same written scope: employees, frameworks, modules, implementation, support level, contract term, renewal cap and the auditor's fee as its own line.

Integrations and automated testing

Comp AI publishes 580+ integrations; Hyperproof doesn't publish a count.

AttributeComp AIHyperproof
Integrations
580+Vendor-reported[5]
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Default test cadence
DailyVendor-reported[5]
You set it: daily, weekly or continuousVendor-reported[6]

Integration counts are vendor claims and are counted differently by each vendor. Test the systems you depend on during a trial.

Frameworks

Comp AI doesn't publish a count; Hyperproof lists 160+.

AttributeComp AIHyperproof
Frameworks published
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
160+Vendor-reported[6]
ISO 27001
IncludedThird-party[3]
IncludedThird-party[3]
HIPAA
IncludedThird-party[3]
IncludedVendor-reported[6]

Capabilities compared

From SOC2Auditors.org capability profiles and vendor plan pages. "Not disclosed" means we could not confirm either way; it does not mean the feature is missing.

AttributeComp AIHyperproof
Auditor workspace
PartialThird-party[3]
IncludedThird-party[3]
Trust centre
IncludedThird-party[3]
PartialThird-party[3]
SCIM provisioning
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
IncludedThird-party[3]
Audit from the same provider
Add-on or higher tierThird-party[3]
Not offeredThird-party[3]
Self-hosting option
IncludedThird-party[3]
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]

Working with your auditor

Neither appears in the directory counts we read.

AttributeComp AIHyperproof
Audit firms in the directory
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Not disclosedNot disclosed[3]
Audit from the same provider
Add-on or higher tierThird-party[3]
Not offeredThird-party[3]

Comp AI says audits can be included in its quote. Hyperproof doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Directory counts are firms that list each platform, not partnerships or quality ratings. [4]

What reviewers say on G2

On G2, Comp AI rates 4.7 from 74 reviews and Hyperproof 4.5 from 223.

Comp AI

Listing-site ratings
G2
4.7
74 reviews

Recurring praise

  • Ease of use42 G2 mentions
  • Support for multiple standards38 G2 mentions

Recurring complaints

  • Lack of guidance19 G2 mentions
  • Limited customization17 G2 mentions

Hyperproof

Listing-site ratings
G2
4.5
223 reviews

Recurring praise

  • Ease of use67 G2 mentions
  • Compliance management37 G2 mentions

Recurring complaints

  • Learning curve17 G2 mentions
  • Learning difficulty13 G2 mentions

Source: [1]

G2 time to implement: Comp AI 1 month, Hyperproof 3 months. Mention counts scale with review volume, so compare them as proportions, not totals. [1]

What each product looks like

Screenshots published by each vendor on its website or G2 listing, credited below each image.

Comp AI

Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages
Comp AI: Cloud monitoring checks for an AWS account
Cloud monitoring checks for an AWS accountImage: Comp AI, via trycomp.ai · retrieved 5 October 2026
Comp AI: Framework progress for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPR
Framework progress for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPRImage: Comp AI, via trycomp.ai · retrieved 5 October 2026
Comp AI: Trust Center page
Trust Center pageImage: Comp AI, via trycomp.ai · retrieved 5 October 2026

Hyperproof

Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages
Hyperproof: Risk register with a risk heat map
Risk register with a risk heat mapImage: Hyperproof, via G2 listing · retrieved 5 October 2026
Hyperproof: Integrations, with a Jira connection being set up
Integrations, with a Jira connection being set upImage: Hyperproof, via G2 listing · retrieved 5 October 2026
Hyperproof: SOC 2 Type 2 audit view with an audit timeline
SOC 2 Type 2 audit view with an audit timelineImage: Hyperproof, via G2 listing · retrieved 5 October 2026

Strengths and limitations

Comp AI

Strengths

  • 99% of the core is open source under AGPLv3, and self-hosting is documented. [5]
  • Claims 580+ integrations, the largest published figure among the nine platforms we compare. [5]
  • 1-month G2 time to implement, the shortest among the nine (tied with Scrut). [1]

Limitations

  • No published rate card; price is given on a sales call. [5]
  • SCIM not established in public documentation. [3]
  • Reviewers cite a lack of guidance (19 G2 mentions) and a small review base (74). [1]

Hyperproof

Strengths

  • Built for established GRC teams running concurrent audits. [3]
  • Claims 160+ pre-built frameworks, including an out-of-the-box HIPAA framework. [6]
  • SCIM provisioning documented through Okta or Entra. [3]

Limitations

  • Highest observed contract median of the seven platforms with Vendr data: $41,400. [2]
  • Longest G2 time to implement among the nine platforms we compare: 3 months. [1]
  • Described as too broad and costly for a small team's first SOC 2. [3]

Five tests to run on both before you sign

  1. Connect your three most important systems

    Use a trial or sandbox to connect your cloud provider, identity provider and code host, and check that each produces evidence without manual uploads.

  2. Ask your auditor which one they work in

    An auditor who already works in a platform usually needs less back-and-forth on evidence.

  3. Get both quotes on the same written scope

    Employees, frameworks, modules, support level, contract term, renewal cap, and the audit as its own line.

  4. Check what is an add-on

    SSO, SCIM, extra frameworks, questionnaires and trust-centre features are often tier-gated. Ask for the full price of the scope you need.

  5. Ask how you would leave

    Confirm you can export policies, evidence with timestamps and test history, and whether read-only access continues after the contract ends.

Alternatives and related comparisons

Compare Comp AI with

All Comp AI alternatives →

Compare Hyperproof with

All Hyperproof alternatives →

Frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures on this page. Where something isn't disclosed, the answer says so.

Is Comp AI or Hyperproof cheaper?

Hyperproof has a published or observed price ($41,400 median); Comp AI quotes on a sales call. Prices depend on employees, frameworks and modules, so compare quotes for the same written scope.

Which has more integrations, Comp AI or Hyperproof?

Comp AI publishes 580+ integrations; Hyperproof doesn't publish a count. Counts are vendor claims; test the systems you depend on.

Do more auditors work with Comp AI or Hyperproof?

Neither appears in the directory counts we read, so ask your audit firm directly.

Which is rated higher on G2, Comp AI or Hyperproof?

On G2, Comp AI rates 4.7 from 74 reviews and Hyperproof 4.5 from 223. Ratings come from self-selected reviewers.

Which is faster to implement?

G2 reviewers report 1 month for Comp AI and 3 months for Hyperproof. Your own timeline depends on scope and how much evidence already exists.

Can Comp AI or Hyperproof include the SOC 2 audit?

Comp AI says audits can be included in its quote. Hyperproof doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately.

Can I switch from Comp AI to Hyperproof mid-audit?

You can, but it is risky during a Type 2 observation period, because your auditor needs continuous evidence for the whole period. Most teams switch between observation periods.