Compliance platform comparison
Drata's typical price is lower ($25,000 median against $41,400 median). Drata publishes 300+ integrations; Hyperproof doesn't publish a count. Drata is listed by 49 directory audit firms; Hyperproof isn't counted. On G2, Drata rates 4.7 from 1,397 reviews and Hyperproof 4.5 from 223.
Short verdict: which one fits you
A fit guide, not a ranking. We don't pick an overall winner.
Choose Drata if…
Neither runs the audit itself. If you want software and audit from one provider, compare Thoropass. [3]
Compliance automation platform with custom tests, compliance checks in infrastructure code and a dedicated auditor portal.
Governance, risk and compliance platform for established teams running several frameworks and audits at once.
Drata's typical price is lower ($25,000 median against $41,400 median).
Observed annual contract values reported by Vendr, read 5 October 2026. These are different buyers and scopes, not quotes. [2]
| Attribute | Drata | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Typical annual price | $25,000 medianThird-party[2] | $41,400 medianThird-party[2] |
| Observed contract range (Vendr) | $9,415 to $68,250Third-party[2] | $22,215 to $70,000Third-party[2] |
Before comparing totals, get both quotes on the same written scope: employees, frameworks, modules, implementation, support level, contract term, renewal cap and the auditor's fee as its own line.
Drata publishes 300+ integrations; Hyperproof doesn't publish a count.
| Attribute | Drata | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | |
| Default test cadence | Daily (7 pm PT)Vendor-reported[10] | You set it: daily, weekly or continuousVendor-reported[11] |
On G2, "Limited integrations" is among Drata's most-mentioned complaints (43 G2 mentions). [7]
Integration counts are vendor claims and are counted differently by each vendor. Test the systems you depend on during a trial.
Drata lists 30+; Hyperproof lists 160+.
| Attribute | Drata | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks published | ||
| ISO 27001 | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| HIPAA | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedVendor-reported[11] |
From SOC2Auditors.org capability profiles and vendor plan pages. "Not disclosed" means we could not confirm either way; it does not mean the feature is missing.
| Attribute | Drata | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Auditor workspace | IncludedVendor-reported[10] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| Trust centre | IncludedThird-party[3] | PartialThird-party[3] |
| SCIM provisioning | Add-on or higher tierVendor-reported[5] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| Audit from the same provider | Not offeredThird-party[3] | Not offeredThird-party[3] |
| Self-hosting option | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] |
Drata is listed by 49 directory audit firms; Hyperproof isn't counted.
| Attribute | Drata | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Audit firms in the directory | 49 directory firmsThird-party[4] | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] |
| Audit from the same provider | Not offeredThird-party[3] | Not offeredThird-party[3] |
Drata doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Hyperproof doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Directory counts are firms that list each platform, not partnerships or quality ratings. [4]
On G2, Drata rates 4.7 from 1,397 reviews and Hyperproof 4.5 from 223.
| G2 | 1,397 reviews |
|---|
| G2 | 223 reviews |
|---|
G2 time to implement: Drata 2 months, Hyperproof 3 months. Mention counts scale with review volume, so compare them as proportions, not totals. [1]
Screenshots published by each vendor on its website or G2 listing, credited below each image.
Use a trial or sandbox to connect your cloud provider, identity provider and code host, and check that each produces evidence without manual uploads.
An auditor who already works in a platform usually needs less back-and-forth on evidence.
Employees, frameworks, modules, support level, contract term, renewal cap, and the audit as its own line.
SSO, SCIM, extra frameworks, questionnaires and trust-centre features are often tier-gated. Ask for the full price of the scope you need.
Confirm you can export policies, evidence with timestamps and test history, and whether read-only access continues after the contract ends.
Answers use the figures on this page. Where something isn't disclosed, the answer says so.
Drata's typical price is lower ($25,000 median against $41,400 median). Prices depend on employees, frameworks and modules, so compare quotes for the same written scope.
Drata publishes 300+ integrations; Hyperproof doesn't publish a count. Counts are vendor claims; test the systems you depend on.
Drata is listed by 49 directory audit firms; Hyperproof isn't counted.
On G2, Drata rates 4.7 from 1,397 reviews and Hyperproof 4.5 from 223. Ratings come from self-selected reviewers.
G2 reviewers report 2 months for Drata and 3 months for Hyperproof. Your own timeline depends on scope and how much evidence already exists.
Drata doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Hyperproof doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately.
You can, but it is risky during a Type 2 observation period, because your auditor needs continuous evidence for the whole period. Most teams switch between observation periods.
