8 Comp AI alternatives for SOC 2 in 2026

1. 01

   Sprinto

   Compliance automation platform focused on guided first-audit preparation for SaaS teams.

   Addresses 4 of 4 reasons

   Best forEarly- to growth-stage SaaS teams seeking guided first-audit preparation

   Switch to it if…You want public pricing data ($15,000 median), more choice of auditor (44 directory firms), an auditor workspace as standard and more guidance during preparation.

   Not ideal if…You'd give up Comp AI's larger integration catalogue (580+ vs 300+) and faster rollout (1 month vs 2 months on G2).

   Price per year

   $13,167–$16,000○Third-party[4]

   G2 rating

   4.7 · 1,685 reviews◐User reviews[3]

   Integrations

   300+●Vendor-reported[13]

   Frameworks

   25+ automated●Vendor-reported[13]

   Implementation

   2 months◐User reviews[3]

   Test cadence

   Every 4–12 hours●Vendor-reported[22]

   What Sprinto looks like

   Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages, credited below each image

   

   

   

   How it differs from Comp AI

   Area	Comp AI current	Sprinto
   Typical price	Not published	$15,000 median
   Integrations	580+	300+
   Frameworks	Not published	25+ automated
   Auditors in the directory	Not counted	44 directory firms
   Default test cadence	Daily	Every 4–12 hours
   G2 time to implement	1 month	2 months

   +Strengths

   • 300+ pre-built integrations. [13]
   • 44 audit firms in SOC2Auditors.org's directory list it. [6]
   • Observed contract median of $15,000 on Vendr, the second-lowest of the seven platforms with Vendr data, after Scrut. [4]
   • Most integration-based checks refresh every 4 to 12 hours, by Sprinto's own documentation. [22]

   −Limitations

   • SCIM provisioning not established in public materials. [5]
   • Custom security roles and RBAC are Growth-plan features. [5]
   • Most of its 200+ frameworks are digitized rather than automated; 25+ are automated out of the box. [13][5]

   What users say

   • +Ease of use418 G2 mentions
   • +Customer support346 G2 mentions
   • −Integration issues74 G2 mentions
   • −Limited integrations42 G2 mentions

   Source: [3]

   Switching effort

   ∅ Not disclosed. We haven't found published migration support from Sprinto. Ask for it in writing, along with what carries over from Comp AI.
2. 02

   Drata

   Compliance automation platform with custom tests, compliance checks in infrastructure code and a dedicated auditor portal.

   Addresses 3 of 4 reasons

   Best forGrowth-stage SaaS teams that expect to add frameworks and want configurable tests

   Switch to it if…You want public pricing data ($25,000 median), more choice of auditor (49 directory firms) and an auditor workspace as standard.

   Not ideal if…You'd give up Comp AI's larger integration catalogue (580+ vs 300+) and faster rollout (1 month vs 2 months on G2).

   Price per year

   $9,415–$68,250○Third-party[4]

   G2 rating

   4.7 · 1,397 reviews◐User reviews[3]

   Integrations

   300+●Vendor-reported[16]

   Frameworks

   30+●Vendor-reported[12]

   Implementation

   2 months◐User reviews[3]

   Test cadence

   Daily (7 pm PT)●Vendor-reported[21]

   What Drata looks like

   Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages, credited below each image

   

   

   

   How it differs from Comp AI

   Area	Comp AI current	Drata
   Typical price	Not published	$25,000 median
   Integrations	580+	300+
   Frameworks	Not published	30+
   Auditors in the directory	Not counted	49 directory firms
   Default test cadence	Daily	Daily (7 pm PT)
   G2 time to implement	1 month	2 months

   +Strengths

   • Listed by the most audit firms in SOC2Auditors.org's directory (49). [6]
   • G2 users rate its support 9.5, against Vanta's 8.9. [17]
   • Custom tests with visible raw output, and compliance checks in infrastructure code. [18][19]

   −Limitations

   • Observed contract median of $25,000 on Vendr, third-highest of the seven platforms with Vendr data, after Hyperproof and Thoropass. [4]
   • Tests run once a day by default, at 7 pm Pacific, not hourly; manual reruns are available. [21]
   • SCIM is listed only on the Enterprise plan; the Foundation plan is capped at 50 employees and one framework. [12]

   What users say

   • +Customer support135 G2 mentions
   • +Ease of use115 G2 mentions
   • −Limited integrations43 G2 mentions

   Source: [17]

   Switching effort

   ∅ Not disclosed. We haven't found published migration support from Drata. Ask for it in writing, along with what carries over from Comp AI.
3. 03

   Scytale

   Compliance automation platform sold in packages that pair the software with consultants, aimed at a first SOC 2.

   Addresses 3 of 4 reasons

   Best forTeams preparing a first SOC 2 without an in-house compliance lead

   Switch to it if…You want public pricing data (from $7,500); an auditor workspace and SCIM provisioning as standard; more guidance during preparation.

   Not ideal if…You'd give up Comp AI's larger integration catalogue (580+ vs 150+) and faster rollout (1 month vs 2 months on G2).

   Price per year

   From $7,500●Vendor-reported[1]

   G2 rating

   4.7 · 779 reviews◐User reviews[3]

   Integrations

   150+●Vendor-reported[2]

   Frameworks

   80+●Vendor-reported[2]

   Implementation

   2 months◐User reviews[3]

   Test cadence

   ∅Not disclosed[2]

   What Scytale looks like

   Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages, credited below each image

   

   

   

   How it differs from Comp AI

   Area	Comp AI current	Scytale
   Typical price	Not published	from $7,500
   Integrations	580+	150+
   Frameworks	Not published	80+
   Auditors in the directory	Not counted	0 directory firms
   Default test cadence	Daily	∅Not disclosed
   G2 time to implement	1 month	2 months

   +Strengths

   • Publishes per-item prices on AWS Marketplace: the platform plus one framework from $7,500 a year, each extra framework from $2,100. [1]
   • Higher packages include consultants, for teams without a compliance lead. [8]
   • Sells a third-party audit service from $4,200 alongside the platform. [1]
   • Lists 12 audit partners on its own site, including PwC, Deloitte, EY and KPMG. [29]

   −Limitations

   • No attestation firm in SOC2Auditors.org's directory lists it as a platform it works with. [8]
   • Extras are priced separately: framework consulting from $4,000, penetration testing from $4,500, security questionnaires from $12,000. [1]
   • Reviews quoted by SmartSuite and SelectHub describe integrations that misbehave when infrastructure doesn't match the expected setup. [9][10]

   What users say

   • +Helpful162 G2 mentions
   • +Ease of use148 G2 mentions
   • −Integration issues45 G2 mentions
   • −Limited integrations35 G2 mentions

   Source: [3]

   Switching effort

   ∅ Not disclosed. We haven't found published migration support from Scytale. Ask for it in writing, along with what carries over from Comp AI.
4. 04

   Secureframe

   Compliance platform sold as named packages (Fundamentals, Complete, Defense) with expert guidance.

   Addresses 3 of 4 reasons

   Best forTeams that want expert guidance on clearly named packages

   Switch to it if…You want public pricing data ($20,000 median), an auditor workspace as standard and more guidance during preparation.

   Not ideal if…You'd give up Comp AI's larger integration catalogue (580+ vs 300+) and faster rollout (1 month vs 2 months on G2).

   Price per year

   $7,733–$32,575○Third-party[4]

   G2 rating

   4.7 · 835 reviews◐User reviews[3]

   Integrations

   300+●Vendor-reported[14]

   Frameworks

   ∅Not disclosed[5]

   Implementation

   2 months◐User reviews[3]

   Test cadence

   Daily to monthly, by test○Third-party[33]

   What Secureframe looks like

   Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages, credited below each image

   

   

   

   How it differs from Comp AI

   Area	Comp AI current	Secureframe
   Typical price	Not published	$20,000 median
   Integrations	580+	300+
   Frameworks	Not published	∅Not disclosed
   Auditors in the directory	Not counted	13 directory firms
   Default test cadence	Daily	Daily to monthly, by test
   G2 time to implement	1 month	2 months

   +Strengths

   • Fundamentals package price published on the vendor site: from $7,500 a year. [14]
   • 300+ native integrations. [14]
   • Trust centre included free on Fundamentals. [5]

   −Limitations

   • SSO and SCIM require the quote-based Complete package. [14][23]
   • Fewer directory auditors than Drata, Sprinto or Vanta (13). [6]

   What users say

   • +Ease of use650 G2 mentions
   • +Compliance552 G2 mentions
   • −Integration issues184 G2 mentions
   • −Limited customization141 G2 mentions

   Source: [3]

   Switching effort

   ∅ Not disclosed. We haven't found published migration support from Secureframe. Ask for it in writing, along with what carries over from Comp AI.
5. 05

   Thoropass

   Compliance platform paired with its related CPA firm, Thoropass Assurance, so software and audit come from one provider.

   Addresses 3 of 4 reasons

   Best forTeams wanting software and a connected audit process from the same provider

   Switch to it if…You want public pricing data ($26,927 median); the audit from the same provider; an auditor workspace and SCIM provisioning as standard.

   Not ideal if…You'd give up Comp AI's larger integration catalogue (580+ vs 200+).

   Price per year

   $1,145–$52,209○Third-party[4]

   G2 rating

   4.7 · 586 reviews◐User reviews[3]

   Integrations

   200+●Vendor-reported[31]

   Frameworks

   18 named●Vendor-reported[27]

   Implementation

   ∅Not disclosed[5]

   Test cadence

   ∅Not disclosed[5]

   What Thoropass looks like

   Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages, credited below each image

   

   

   

   How it differs from Comp AI

   Area	Comp AI current	Thoropass
   Typical price	Not published	$26,927 median
   Integrations	580+	200+
   Frameworks	Not published	18 named
   Auditors in the directory	Not counted	Own CPA firm
   Default test cadence	Daily	∅Not disclosed
   G2 time to implement	1 month	∅Not disclosed

   +Strengths

   • Software and audit from one provider, through its related CPA firm, Thoropass Assurance. [5]
   • SCIM 2.0 provisioning documented for Entra and Okta; the API key comes from your customer success manager. [26]
   • "Helpful" is among the most-mentioned positives in its G2 reviews (221 mentions). [3]

   −Limitations

   • Software and audit are priced separately, so the total needs two quotes. [5]
   • Reviewers cite a lack of clarity and integration issues (39 and 34 G2 mentions). [3]
   • Observed contract median of $26,927 on Vendr, second-highest of the seven platforms with Vendr data. [4]

   What users say

   • +Ease of use239 G2 mentions
   • +Helpful221 G2 mentions
   • −Lack of clarity39 G2 mentions
   • −Integration issues34 G2 mentions

   Source: [3]

   Switching effort

   ∅ Not disclosed. We haven't found published migration support from Thoropass. Ask for it in writing, along with what carries over from Comp AI.
6. 06

   Vanta

   Compliance automation platform with the largest published integration catalogue and hourly automated tests.

   Addresses 3 of 4 reasons

   Best forCloud-native SaaS teams on mainstream stacks that want broad, prebuilt coverage

   Switch to it if…You want public pricing data ($20,000 median), more choice of auditor (40 directory firms) and an auditor workspace as standard.

   Not ideal if…You'd give up Comp AI's larger integration catalogue (580+ vs 400+) and faster rollout (1 month vs 2 months on G2).

   Price per year

   $7,500–$57,221○Third-party[4]

   G2 rating

   4.5 · 2,853 reviews◐User reviews[3]

   Integrations

   400+●Vendor-reported[11]

   Frameworks

   35+●Vendor-reported[11]

   Implementation

   2 months◐User reviews[3]

   Test cadence

   Hourly●Vendor-reported[11]

   What Vanta looks like

   Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages, credited below each image

   

   

   

   How it differs from Comp AI

   Area	Comp AI current	Vanta
   Typical price	Not published	$20,000 median
   Integrations	580+	400+
   Frameworks	Not published	35+
   Auditors in the directory	Not counted	40 directory firms
   Default test cadence	Daily	Hourly
   G2 time to implement	1 month	2 months

   +Strengths

   • Hourly automated tests by default, the most frequent published cadence among the nine platforms we compare. [11]
   • 400+ integrations, and 40 audit firms in SOC2Auditors.org's directory list it. [11][6]
   • Full SCIM account lifecycle documented. [5]

   −Limitations

   • SCIM may need a plan upgrade or add-on, per Vanta's own help centre. [20]
   • Reviewers rate its support below Drata's (8.9 vs 9.5 on G2). [17]
   • Observed contracts range widely, up to $57,221 a year. [4]

   What users say

   • +Ease of use675 G2 mentions
   • +Time saved through automation405 G2 mentions
   • −Integration issues179 G2 mentions

   Source: [17]

   Switching effort

   ∅ Not disclosed. We haven't found published migration support from Vanta. Ask for it in writing, along with what carries over from Comp AI.
7. 07

   Hyperproof

   Governance, risk and compliance platform for established teams running several frameworks and audits at once.

   Addresses 2 of 4 reasons

   Best forEstablished GRC teams running several frameworks and audits at once

   Switch to it if…You want public pricing data ($41,400 median); an auditor workspace and SCIM provisioning as standard.

   Not ideal if…You'd give up Comp AI's faster rollout (1 month vs 3 months on G2).

   Price per year

   $22,215–$70,000○Third-party[4]

   G2 rating

   4.5 · 223 reviews◐User reviews[3]

   Integrations

   ∅Not disclosed[5]

   Frameworks

   160+●Vendor-reported[28]

   Implementation

   3 months◐User reviews[3]

   Test cadence

   You set it: daily, weekly or continuous●Vendor-reported[28]

   What Hyperproof looks like

   Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages, credited below each image

   

   

   

   How it differs from Comp AI

   Area	Comp AI current	Hyperproof
   Typical price	Not published	$41,400 median
   Integrations	580+	∅Not disclosed
   Frameworks	Not published	160+
   Auditors in the directory	Not counted	∅Not disclosed
   Default test cadence	Daily	You set it: daily, weekly or continuous
   G2 time to implement	1 month	3 months

   +Strengths

   • Built for established GRC teams running concurrent audits. [5]
   • Claims 160+ pre-built frameworks, including an out-of-the-box HIPAA framework. [28]
   • SCIM provisioning documented through Okta or Entra. [5]

   −Limitations

   • Highest observed contract median of the seven platforms with Vendr data: $41,400. [4]
   • Longest G2 time to implement among the nine platforms we compare: 3 months. [3]
   • Described as too broad and costly for a small team's first SOC 2. [5]

   What users say

   • +Ease of use67 G2 mentions
   • +Compliance management37 G2 mentions
   • −Learning curve17 G2 mentions
   • −Learning difficulty13 G2 mentions

   Source: [3]

   Switching effort

   ∅ Not disclosed. We haven't found published migration support from Hyperproof. Ask for it in writing, along with what carries over from Comp AI.
8. 08

   Scrut Automation

   Compliance and risk platform for growth-stage tech teams running SOC 2 alongside other frameworks.

   Addresses 2 of 4 reasons

   Best forGrowth-stage tech teams managing SOC 2 alongside other frameworks

   Switch to it if…You want public pricing data ($7,250 median); an auditor workspace and SCIM provisioning as standard.

   Not ideal if…AWS Marketplace lists $15,000 a year for teams of up to 20 employees; other quotes are by request.

   Price per year

   $5,160–$27,050○Third-party[4]

   G2 rating

   4.9 · 1,338 reviews◐User reviews[3]

   Integrations

   ∅Not disclosed[5]

   Frameworks

   60 listed●Vendor-reported[25]

   Implementation

   1 month◐User reviews[3]

   Test cadence

   Daily○Third-party[30]

   What Scrut Automation looks like

   Screenshots from the vendor's website or listing pages, credited below each image

   

   

   How it differs from Comp AI

   Area	Comp AI current	Scrut Automation
   Typical price	Not published	$7,250 median
   Integrations	580+	∅Not disclosed
   Frameworks	Not published	60 listed
   Auditors in the directory	Not counted	1 directory firm
   Default test cadence	Daily	Daily
   G2 time to implement	1 month	1 month

   +Strengths

   • Highest G2 rating among the nine platforms we compare: 4.9 from 1,338 reviews. [3]
   • Lowest observed contract median of the seven platforms with Vendr data: $7,250 a year. [4]
   • 1-month G2 time to implement, the shortest among the nine (tied with Comp AI). [3]
   • Listed with SCIM in Okta's catalogue; trust portal and auditor access documented. [5]

   −Limitations

   • AWS Marketplace lists $15,000 a year for teams of up to 20 employees; other quotes are by request. [7][30]
   • Only one firm in SOC2Auditors.org's directory lists it as a platform it works with. [32]
   • Which plan includes SCIM is not public. [5]

   What users say

   ∅ Review themes not yet compiled. Scrut Automation has 1,338 G2 reviews; we haven't coded their recurring themes yet, so we don't summarise them here.

   Switching effort

   ∅ Not disclosed. We haven't found published migration support from Scrut Automation. Ask for it in writing, along with what carries over from Comp AI.

No profiles match the current filters.

• ✓Included
• +Add-on or higher tier
• ◐Partial
• –Not offered
• ∅Not disclosed

Capability states come from the sources cited in each profile; most are from [5][2][20][21][12][22][23][24][26][28].

1. 01

   Export everything before you give notice

   Download policies, evidence with timestamps, the risk register, vendor reviews and any test history. Some exports are only available while your contract is active.

2. 02

   Time the switch around your observation period

   Switch between observation periods, not during one. If the renewal falls mid-period, ask Comp AI for a short extension rather than moving tools mid-audit.

3. 03

   Tell your auditor before you sign

   Confirm they can audit from the new platform or accept its exports.

4. 04

   Run both tools for one control cycle

   Connect the new platform and compare its test results with Comp AI's for about 30 days before relying on it.

5. 05

   Keep read-only access until the report is issued

   Your auditor may ask for evidence from the old system. Negotiate read-only access, or keep a dated archive of every export.