Compliance platform comparison
Both have a typical price of $20,000. Vanta publishes the larger integration catalogue (400+ vs 300+). Vanta is listed by more audit firms in SOC2Auditors.org's directory (40 vs 13). On G2, Secureframe rates 4.7 from 835 reviews and Vanta 4.5 from 2,853.
Short verdict: which one fits you
A fit guide, not a ranking. We don't pick an overall winner.
Choose Secureframe if…
Choose Vanta if…
Neither runs the audit itself. If you want software and audit from one provider, compare Thoropass. [3]
Compliance platform sold as named packages (Fundamentals, Complete, Defense) with expert guidance.
Compliance automation platform with the largest published integration catalogue and hourly automated tests.
Both have a typical price of $20,000.
Observed annual contract values reported by Vendr, read 5 October 2026. These are different buyers and scopes, not quotes. [2]
| Attribute | Secureframe | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| Typical annual price | $20,000 medianThird-party[2] | $20,000 medianThird-party[2] |
| Observed contract range (Vendr) | $7,733 to $32,575Third-party[2] | $7,500 to $57,221Third-party[2] |
Before comparing totals, get both quotes on the same written scope: employees, frameworks, modules, implementation, support level, contract term, renewal cap and the auditor's fee as its own line.
Vanta publishes the larger integration catalogue (400+ vs 300+).
| Attribute | Secureframe | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | ||
| Default test cadence | Daily to monthly, by testThird-party[10] | HourlyVendor-reported[5] |
On G2, "Integration issues" is among Secureframe's most-mentioned complaints (184 G2 mentions). [1]
On G2, "Integration issues" is among Vanta's most-mentioned complaints (179 G2 mentions). [7]
Integration counts are vendor claims and are counted differently by each vendor. Test the systems you depend on during a trial.
Secureframe doesn't publish a count; Vanta lists 35+.
| Attribute | Secureframe | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks published | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | |
| ISO 27001 | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| HIPAA | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
From SOC2Auditors.org capability profiles and vendor plan pages. "Not disclosed" means we could not confirm either way; it does not mean the feature is missing.
| Attribute | Secureframe | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| Auditor workspace | IncludedVendor-reported[9] | IncludedVendor-reported[8] |
| Trust centre | IncludedThird-party[3] | IncludedThird-party[3] |
| SCIM provisioning | Add-on or higher tierVendor-reported[9] | Add-on or higher tierVendor-reported[8] |
| Audit from the same provider | Not offeredThird-party[3] | Add-on or higher tierThird-party[3] |
| Self-hosting option | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] | Not disclosedNot disclosed[3] |
Vanta is listed by more audit firms in SOC2Auditors.org's directory (40 vs 13).
| Attribute | Secureframe | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| Audit firms in the directory | 13 directory firmsThird-party[4] | 40 directory firmsThird-party[4] |
| Audit from the same provider | Not offeredThird-party[3] | Add-on or higher tierThird-party[3] |
Secureframe doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Vanta sells a package that can include an independent auditor's fee. Directory counts are firms that list each platform, not partnerships or quality ratings. [4]
On G2, Secureframe rates 4.7 from 835 reviews and Vanta 4.5 from 2,853.
| G2 | 835 reviews |
|---|
| G2 | 2,853 reviews |
|---|
G2 time to implement: Secureframe 2 months, Vanta 2 months. Mention counts scale with review volume, so compare them as proportions, not totals. [1]
Screenshots published by each vendor on its website or G2 listing, credited below each image.
Use a trial or sandbox to connect your cloud provider, identity provider and code host, and check that each produces evidence without manual uploads.
An auditor who already works in a platform usually needs less back-and-forth on evidence.
Employees, frameworks, modules, support level, contract term, renewal cap, and the audit as its own line.
SSO, SCIM, extra frameworks, questionnaires and trust-centre features are often tier-gated. Ask for the full price of the scope you need.
Confirm you can export policies, evidence with timestamps and test history, and whether read-only access continues after the contract ends.
Answers use the figures on this page. Where something isn't disclosed, the answer says so.
Both have a typical price of $20,000. Prices depend on employees, frameworks and modules, so compare quotes for the same written scope.
Vanta publishes the larger integration catalogue (400+ vs 300+). Counts are vendor claims; test the systems you depend on.
Vanta is listed by more audit firms in SOC2Auditors.org's directory (40 vs 13).
On G2, Secureframe rates 4.7 from 835 reviews and Vanta 4.5 from 2,853. Ratings come from self-selected reviewers.
G2 reviewers report 2 months for Secureframe and 2 months for Vanta. Your own timeline depends on scope and how much evidence already exists.
Secureframe doesn't sell the audit; you hire a firm separately. Vanta sells a package that can include an independent auditor's fee.
You can, but it is risky during a Type 2 observation period, because your auditor needs continuous evidence for the whole period. Most teams switch between observation periods.
